[Bug target/81535] [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr79439.c fails starting with r250442

2018-02-16 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81535 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/81535] [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr79439.c fails starting with r250442

2018-02-16 Thread ygribov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81535 --- Comment #11 from Yury Gribov --- Author: ygribov Date: Fri Feb 16 20:38:14 2018 New Revision: 257760 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257760=gcc=rev Log: Fix PowerPC tests in PR 81535. gcc/testsuite/ 2018-02-16 Yury Gribov

[Bug target/81535] [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr79439.c fails starting with r250442

2018-02-13 Thread willschm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81535 Will Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||willschm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/81535] [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr79439.c fails starting with r250442

2018-01-24 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81535 --- Comment #9 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Just an FYI that the output of this test case changed a bit somewhere in the range r256987 to r257017: Now it gets this: FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/pr79439.c scan-assembler-times \\mbl g\\M 1

[Bug target/81535] [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr79439.c fails starting with r250442

2018-01-10 Thread ygribov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81535 --- Comment #8 from Yury Gribov --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > Any further progress? I see you've posted something, but no further > follow-ups from you nor Segher. Jakub, I didn't contribute for few months now due to health

[Bug target/81535] [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr79439.c fails starting with r250442

2018-01-10 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81535 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Any further progress? I see you've posted something, but no further follow-ups from you nor Segher.

[Bug target/81535] [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr79439.c fails starting with r250442

2018-01-10 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81535 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/81535] [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr79439.c fails starting with r250442

2017-11-24 Thread ygribov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81535 --- Comment #6 from Yury Gribov --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > Any progress with this? I filed patch back then (https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-07/msg01873.html) and missed reply from Segher. I'll reply to his

[Bug target/81535] [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr79439.c fails starting with r250442

2017-11-24 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81535 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug target/81535] [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr79439.c fails starting with r250442

2017-07-25 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81535 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug target/81535] [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr79439.c fails starting with r250442

2017-07-24 Thread ygribov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81535 --- Comment #4 from Yury Gribov --- Created attachment 41824 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41824=edit Update pattern for Power Another option is to adapt test for Power (attached but not tested).

[Bug target/81535] [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr79439.c fails starting with r250442

2017-07-24 Thread ygribov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81535 --- Comment #3 from Yury Gribov --- Created attachment 41822 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41822=edit Patch to disable test on PowerPC (In reply to Yury Gribov from comment #2) > pr56727-2.c is interesting, it does not

[Bug target/81535] [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr79439.c fails starting with r250442

2017-07-24 Thread ygribov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81535 --- Comment #2 from Yury Gribov --- Thanks for detailed report. For pr79439.c take a look at discussion in bug 56727 - the general agreement there was that it should be valid to replace recursive PLT calls with direct calls as long as function

[Bug target/81535] [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr79439.c fails starting with r250442

2017-07-24 Thread ygribov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81535 Yury Gribov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/81535] [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr79439.c fails starting with r250442

2017-07-24 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81535 --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- The failures also occur on powerpc64 BE. This test that was added in this revision also fails: spawn /home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test/gcc/xgcc -B/home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test/gcc/