https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83368
--- Comment #20 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Thanks for the fix; is this a candidate for backporting to the gcc-7 branch?
> If not we can just carry it in Debian, but it would be nicer to have it
> upstream.
Sorry, it looks like I missed this messag
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83368
--- Comment #19 from James Clarke ---
Thanks for the fix; is this a candidate for backporting to the gcc-7 branch? If
not we can just carry it in Debian, but it would be nicer to have it upstream.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83368
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83368
--- Comment #17 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Jan 12 11:29:30 2018
New Revision: 256575
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256575&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/83368
* config/sparc/sparc.h (PIC_OFFSET_TA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83368
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83368
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|WONTFIX
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83368
--- Comment #14 from James Clarke ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #12)
> > Can't be done without an ABI break. But it is just the PIC register, and I'm
> > still of the view this is a GCC bug. You seem to not be listening to my
> > ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83368
--- Comment #13 from James Clarke ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #11)
> > > Again you're wrong, the call-saved registers are properly preserved if you
> > > don't clobber the stack pointer, just write a small test or simply tweak
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83368
--- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Can't be done without an ABI break. But it is just the PIC register, and I'm
> still of the view this is a GCC bug. You seem to not be listening to my
> arguments and just reciting that "setjmp must save c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83368
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou ---
> > Again you're wrong, the call-saved registers are properly preserved if you
> > don't clobber the stack pointer, just write a small test or simply tweak
> > yours.
>
> Yes, I know that.
OK, at least som
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83368
--- Comment #10 from James Clarke ---
(In reply to James Clarke from comment #9)
> (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #7)
> > > And for what it's worth, 32-bit Solaris/SPARC's setjmp isn't saving any of
> > > the caller's input or local regi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83368
--- Comment #9 from James Clarke ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #7)
> > And for what it's worth, 32-bit Solaris/SPARC's setjmp isn't saving any of
> > the caller's input or local registers either, so it's not glibc-specific.
>
> Aga
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83368
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ---
> You already have code in sched-deps.c to deal with setjmp potentially not
> saving registers it should across all architectures:
>
> if (find_reg_note (insn, REG_SETJMP, NULL))
> {
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83368
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83368
--- Comment #6 from James Clarke ---
And for what it's worth, 32-bit Solaris/SPARC's setjmp isn't saving any of the
caller's input or local registers either, so it's not glibc-specific.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83368
James Clarke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|WONTFIX
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83368
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83368
James Clarke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83368
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83368
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
20 matches
Mail list logo