https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83925
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Given the issues we had on ARM, AArch64 (see exempli gratia PR65956 and
associated discussions), et cetera with overaligned/underaligned scalars, I
think the right thing is not to consider alignment for the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83925
Tom Lane changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tgl at sss dot pgh.pa.us
--- Comment #8 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83925
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou ---
128-bit types requite 128-bit alignment on SPARC64 so we cannot support that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83925
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83925
--- Comment #5 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 43175
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43175=edit
unpreprocessed input
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83925
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83925
--- Comment #3 from Марина Полякова ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Note GCC 5 is no longer maintained - can you test a newer version?
No, I can't because pkgutil has only gcc 4 or 5 :-(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83925
--- Comment #2 from Марина Полякова ---
No, I can't because pkgutil has only gcc 4 or 5 :-(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83925
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ABI
Target|
