https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83946
--- Comment #11 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Fri Jan 26 21:31:37 2018
New Revision: 257110
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257110&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rs6000: Fix safe-indirect-jump-[18].c
Thist patch merges the safe-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83946
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83946
--- Comment #9 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Mon Jan 22 02:46:11 2018
New Revision: 256939
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256939&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-01-21 Bill Schmidt
PR target/83946
* gcc.target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83946
--- Comment #8 from Bill Schmidt ---
Segher was kind enough to run AIX tests for me last night. There is still one
non-blocking issue with safe-indirect-jump-8.c, which should be skipped for
AIX, since it doesn't generate sibcalls to non-local f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83946
--- Comment #7 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Sun Jan 21 13:32:58 2018
New Revision: 256932
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256932&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2018-01-21 Bill Schmidt
Backport from mainline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83946
--- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Sun Jan 21 13:26:07 2018
New Revision: 256931
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256931&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2018-01-21 Bill Schmidt
David Edelsohn
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83946
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |wschmidt at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83946
--- Comment #4 from David Edelsohn ---
The rest of rs6000.md uses "$" unconditionally for the same purpose, although
common parts of GCC uses ".".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83946
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Does $ instead of . work on non-AIX though, and even if it does, isn't .
preferrable? I.e. shouldn't the changes be conditional on AIX (or just AIX
assembler, GAS should handle . on all targets)?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83946
--- Comment #2 from David Edelsohn ---
Created attachment 43191
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43191&action=edit
proposed patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83946
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
11 matches
Mail list logo