[Bug target/84760] Finish implementation of __builtin_altivec_lvx_v1ti

2018-03-08 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84760 --- Comment #1 from Bill Schmidt --- Hm. For this one I think I would recommend we just remove the partial implementation, provided that vec_ld already supports vector __int128.

[Bug target/84760] Finish implementation of __builtin_altivec_lvx_v1ti

2018-03-08 Thread kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84760 --- Comment #2 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org --- I don't argue either way on this, but it looks to me like we do not currently have support for __int128 with vec_ld. 1. I can't fine it in the rs6000-c tables. 2. This test fails to compile: #in

[Bug target/84760] Finish implementation of __builtin_altivec_lvx_v1ti

2018-03-08 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84760 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/84760] Finish implementation of __builtin_altivec_lvx_v1ti

2018-03-22 Thread kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84760 --- Comment #4 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kelvin Date: Thu Mar 22 15:42:39 2018 New Revision: 258774 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258774&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ChangeLog: 2018-03-22 Kelvin Nilsen PR target

[Bug target/84760] Finish implementation of __builtin_altivec_lvx_v1ti

2018-03-22 Thread kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84760 kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|-