https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85666
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85666
--- Comment #15 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Author: hp
Date: Sun Sep 16 21:23:36 2018
New Revision: 264351
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264351&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/85666
* config/mmix/mmix.c (mmix_assemble_int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85666
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85666
--- Comment #13 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Author: hp
Date: Sun Sep 9 18:12:14 2018
New Revision: 264183
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264183&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/85666
* config/mmix/mmix.c (mmix_assemble_int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85666
--- Comment #12 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Author: hp
Date: Sun Sep 9 18:05:48 2018
New Revision: 264182
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264182&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/85666
* config/mmix/mmix.c (MMIX_CFUN_NEEDS_S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85666
--- Comment #11 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #10)
> Created attachment 44180 [details]
> patch to mmix.c
>
> Builds libgcc. More late this weekend, I hope.
I now see the assertion in assemble_integer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85666
--- Comment #10 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Created attachment 44180
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44180&action=edit
patch to mmix.c
Builds libgcc. More late this weekend, I hope.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85666
--- Comment #9 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Wilco from comment #8)
> I don't think that comment is accurate.
Of course it isn't accurate *now*, but it explains why the code looks as it is.
I see the "phase-computing" code in expand_u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85666
--- Comment #8 from Wilco ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #7)
> Thank you for your interest in the MMIX port.
>
> (In reply to Wilco from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #1)
> >
> > > #define MMIX_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85666
--- Comment #7 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Thank you for your interest in the MMIX port.
(In reply to Wilco from comment #3)
> (In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #1)
>
> > #define MMIX_CFUN_NEEDS_SAVED_EH_RETURN_ADDRESS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85666
--- Comment #6 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
An observation (does not pretend to be a fix) to make gcc compile standard
library and be able to build runnable hello world on gcc master:
1. MMIX_CFUN_NEEDS_SAVED_EH_RETURN_ADDRESS can be unoptimised
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85666
--- Comment #5 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #4)
> (In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #0)
> > gcc-7.3.0 worked. gcc-8.0.1 fails as:
>
> Don't you mean "9.0.1" which is what gcc outputs for the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85666
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85666
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Wil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85666
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wdijkstr at arm dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85666
--- Comment #1 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
looks like leaf_function_p() predicate fails right at start of cfgexpand when
it tries to pick stack frame size. leaf_function_p() has a few hints that it's
knowingly trying to do it before expand finish
16 matches
Mail list logo
