https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86538
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86538
--- Comment #7 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Wed May 1 15:27:40 2019
New Revision: 270770
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270770&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[Patch AArch64] Add __ARM_FEATURE_ATOMICS
This keeps coming up
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86538
--- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Tue Apr 30 14:57:50 2019
New Revision: 270702
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270702&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[Patch AArch64] Add __ARM_FEATURE_ATOMICS
This keeps coming up
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86538
--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Tue Apr 30 12:02:30 2019
New Revision: 270689
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270689&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[Patch AArch64] Add __ARM_FEATURE_ATOMICS
This keeps coming u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86538
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Tue Apr 30 11:22:11 2019
New Revision: 270686
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270686&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[Patch AArch64] Add __ARM_FEATURE_ATOMICS
This keeps coming up r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86538
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86538
--- Comment #2 from Steve Ellcey ---
While I agree that we want users to use the __sync and atomic primitives,
it still seems like it would be useful in some cases to know if the LSE
operations are available and if GCC is generating code for them
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86538
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86538
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |WONTFIX
