[Bug target/89222] [7.x regression] ARM thumb-2 misoptimisation of func ptr call with -O2 or -Os

2019-02-08 Thread wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89222 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/89222] [7.x regression] ARM thumb-2 misoptimisation of func ptr call with -O2 or -Os

2019-02-08 Thread wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89222 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 from

[Bug target/89222] [7.x regression] ARM thumb-2 misoptimisation of func ptr call with -O2 or -Os

2019-02-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89222 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code --- Comment #4 from Andrew

[Bug target/89222] [7.x regression] ARM thumb-2 misoptimisation of func ptr call with -O2 or -Os

2019-02-06 Thread jifl-bugzilla at jifvik dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89222 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Larmour --- Thanks for the quick reply. (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > Not confirming since it is unclear even on what OS you are using this It's an embedded OS, so from your point of view, it's

[Bug target/89222] [7.x regression] ARM thumb-2 misoptimisation of func ptr call with -O2 or -Os

2019-02-06 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89222 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Not confirming since it is unclear even on what OS you are using this and what to look for (I don't see r5 set close to start of main etc.). That said, if hal_setjmp works similarly to setjmp, but you don't