[Bug target/91274] vec_splat_[us]64 missing for ppc

2020-01-21 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91274 --- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt --- The short answer is history. Those others were inherited from the old Altivec PIM. Having splat-immediates with different names for different sizes and signedness isn't consistent with the rest of the

[Bug target/91274] vec_splat_[us]64 missing for ppc

2020-01-21 Thread cand at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91274 --- Comment #3 from Lauri Kasanen --- Then why is every other type supported, but not 64? It makes no sense.

[Bug target/91274] vec_splat_[us]64 missing for ppc

2020-01-21 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91274 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/91274] vec_splat_[us]64 missing for ppc

2020-01-21 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91274 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,