https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498
--- Comment #19 from Richard Biener ---
Doesn't seem fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498
--- Comment #18 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #17)
> Can the issue be closed as resolved?
I've fixed a -fno-common issue on the tester and will report back after the
next run.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498
--- Comment #16 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #13 from Uroš Bizjak ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #10)
>> > +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/minmax-7.c scan-assembler pminsd
>>
>> Not for me. I've used
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498
--- Comment #15 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 46737
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46737=edit
Patch for 32-bit Solaris/x86 failures
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Aug 21 08:44:59 2019
New Revision: 274792
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274792=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-08-21 Richard Biener
PR target/91498
PR target/91503
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498
--- Comment #13 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #10)
> > +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/minmax-7.c scan-assembler pminsd
>
> Not for me. I've used -march=haswell in all of these testcases to
> rule out ISA and cost
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dimhen at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 20 Aug 2019, asolokha at gmx dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498
>
> Arseny Solokha changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 20 Aug 2019, ro at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498
>
> Rainer Orth changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
Our SPEC CPU 2017 failed with
39 util.c:205:1: error: invalid rtl sharing found in the insn
40 205 | }
41 | ^
42 (insn 29 28 3 2 (set (subreg:V2DI (reg:DI 91) 0)
43 (vec_concat:V2DI (mem/c:DI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #5)
> (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #4)
> > Following patch
>
> HJ, can you please put the patch through some benchmarks? (I have no access
> to SPEC).
Sure. We will
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #4)
> Following patch
HJ, can you please put the patch through some benchmarks? (I have no access to
SPEC).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Following patch
--cut here--
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
index 49ab50ea41bf..11c75be113e0 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
@@ -18601,9 +18601,9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Aug 20 08:45:56 2019
New Revision: 274694
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274694=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-08-20 Richard Biener
PR target/91498
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Patch that causes gcc.target/i386/minmax-6.c to spill to the stack:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-08/msg01283.html
>
> This makes SI/DImode chains
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Patch that causes gcc.target/i386/minmax-6.c to spill to the stack:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-08/msg01283.html
This makes SI/DImode chains handled by STV2 only (after combine). We can
take
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization, ra
22 matches
Mail list logo
