https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91518
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Xiong Hu Luo :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f6955089db6c3aa63c276704159ffad1ef15d256
commit r10-7981-gf6955089db6c3aa63c276704159ffad1ef15d256
Author: Xionghu Luo
Date: Sun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91518
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91518
luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91518
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P3
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91518
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91518
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91518
--- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt ---
r8 should be the base address, for what it's worth. For a version of GCC where
this is working, a data address is loaded there. For the failing version, we
see a value of 1 loaded instead.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91518
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 23 Aug 2019, luoxhu at cn dot ibm.com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91518
>
> --- Comment #3 from Xiong Hu XS Luo ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91518
--- Comment #3 from Xiong Hu XS Luo ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> Not seen on x86_64. Given you bisected to r263875 it should appear with GCC
> 9 as well - are the actual GCC 9 releases also affected?
>
> I assume this is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91518
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64le
10 matches
Mail list logo
