[Bug target/92626] [9/10 Regression] Performance regression in compress-rar on CLX server

2020-03-31 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92626 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|WAITING

[Bug target/92626] [9/10 Regression] Performance regression in compress-rar on CLX server

2020-03-31 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92626 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug target/92626] [9/10 Regression] Performance regression in compress-rar on CLX server

2020-03-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92626 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug target/92626] [9/10 Regression] Performance regression in compress-rar on CLX server

2019-11-26 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92626 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- I'd say libgcc is extremely unlikely, for glibc it depends on whether the different clear snapshots (or releases or what it is) have each glibc compiled by a particular gcc snapshot or not, libstdc++ is unlik

[Bug target/92626] [9/10 Regression] Performance regression in compress-rar on CLX server

2019-11-26 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92626 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/92626] [9/10 Regression] Performance regression in compress-rar on CLX server

2019-11-25 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92626 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization,