https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94254
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94254
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:713ecb3d417363a4b12c725b335fce10355da206
commit r10-7380-g713ecb3d417363a4b12c725b335fce10355da206
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Wed Mar 25
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94254
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #18 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94254
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at debian dot org
--- Comment #17
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94254
--- Comment #16 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Zdenek Sojka from comment #14)
> (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #11)
> > Created attachment 48088 [details]
> > Candidate patch
>
> It fixes the build for me.
> I am unable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94254
--- Comment #15 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #13)
> (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #12)
> > That patch looks fine, thank you!
> >
> > Is there some way you can test if this works? Idea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94254
--- Comment #14 from Zdenek Sojka ---
(In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #11)
> Created attachment 48088 [details]
> Candidate patch
It fixes the build for me.
I am unable to find a way how to run the testsuite on a non-native system
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94254
--- Comment #13 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #12)
> That patch looks fine, thank you!
>
> Is there some way you can test if this works? Ideally in the testsuite
> of course, but that can be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94254
--- Comment #12 from Segher Boessenkool ---
That patch looks fine, thank you!
Is there some way you can test if this works? Ideally in the testsuite
of course, but that can be hard :-/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94254
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #48080|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94254
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94254
--- Comment #9 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #8)
> SFmode values are stored as DP IEEE float normally. There may be other
> cases as well, but this is the obvious one.
OK, thanks. Does the s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94254
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94254
--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool ---
SFmode values are stored as DP IEEE float normally. There may be other
cases as well, but this is the obvious one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94254
--- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Created attachment 48080
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48080&action=edit
Proof-of-concept hack to back up the point in comment 4
This hack shows what I mean in comment 4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94254
--- Comment #6 from Zdenek Sojka ---
(In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #5)
> (In reply to Zdenek Sojka from comment #1)
> > I observe the same issue, and it breaks libgcc build for me:
>
> What configure arguments do you use?
Confi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94254
--- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Zdenek Sojka from comment #1)
> I observe the same issue, and it breaks libgcc build for me:
What configure arguments do you use?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94254
--- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
The cycling comes from reloading:
(insn 7 6 8 2 (set (reg:SD 122 [ a32 ])
(mem/c:SD (reg/f:DI 120) [1 a32+0 S4 A32]))
"gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr39902-2.c":15:13 516 {movsd_ha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94254
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94254
--- Comment #2 from Zdenek Sojka ---
(In reply to Zdenek Sojka from comment #1)
> I observe the same issue, and it breaks libgcc build for me:
...
>
> (for reasons unknown to me, git gcc-descr returns "r10-7320" for me for the
> same git checko
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94254
Zdenek Sojka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #1 fr
21 matches
Mail list logo
