--- Comment #12 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-13 09:39
---
Fixed.
--
rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #11 from ramana dot r at gmail dot com 2009-02-08 05:23 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> This might have been implemented for 4.4 already. Section anchors now have
> been enabled for ARM.
>
4.4 seems to enable this with section anchors turned on. This is the code
generated.
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-20 00:26
---
This might have been implemented for 4.4 already. Section anchors now have
been enabled for ARM.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9703
--- Comment #9 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-18 22:22
---
The patch I committed should provide the general infrastructure,
but an ARM patch will be needed to make use of it. ARM code
would also benefit if we tried to reuse addresses that the
function had to calculate any
--- Comment #8 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-18 22:07
---
Subject: Bug 9703
Author: rsandifo
Date: Sat Feb 18 22:06:53 2006
New Revision: 111254
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111254
Log:
* cselib.c (cselib_init): Change RTX_SIZE to RTX_CO
--- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-02 17:14
---
Patch posted here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg00133.html
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-02 16:54 ---
Should be helped or almost ready to be fixed by:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Section%20Anchor%20Optimisations
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9703
--- Additional Comments From raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2005-09-27
03:20 ---
This is still exhibited on mainline gcc.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9703
