https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
--- Comment #11 from Iain Sandoe ---
Created attachment 49581
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49581&action=edit
regenerated files
the second patch is all the regenerated files .. much larger :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
--- Comment #9 from Jürgen Reuter ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #8)
> (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #4)
>
> It's OK to need it (there are legitimate design reasons to do so) - however
> where that need exists, the -Wl,-und
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
--- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #4)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #3)
> > I didn't have x86 Big Sur until the weekend - still working through things.
> > 1/
> >
> > The change you have keeps
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
--- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #6)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #5)
> > I bootstrapped several times (without using MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET) and
> > have been looking into other issues.
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
--- Comment #6 from Jürgen Reuter ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #5)
> I bootstrapped several times (without using MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET) and
> have been looking into other issues.
>
> Note that the libgfortran directory throws up
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
--- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe ---
I bootstrapped several times (without using MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET) and have
been looking into other issues.
Note that the libgfortran directory throws up a lot of warnings when
'autoreconf'ed' so maybe ther
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
--- Comment #4 from Jürgen Reuter ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #3)
> I didn't have x86 Big Sur until the weekend - still working through things.
>
> 1/
>
> The change you have keeps the default as $wl-undefined ${wl}dynamic_lookup,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-11-17
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
--- Comment #2 from Jürgen Reuter ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #1)
> This should probably handled by upstream libtool
Indeed I reported this to libtool as well, and I was not the first apparently.
How do you include this? In our c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
11 matches
Mail list logo