https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98341
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98341
--- Comment #10 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Arnaud Charlet from comment #9)
> The problem is somehow specific to m68k, for some unknown reason. There is
> nothing target specific in the change, no assumption is made on the
> u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98341
--- Comment #9 from Arnaud Charlet ---
The problem is somehow specific to m68k, for some unknown reason. There is
nothing target specific in the change, no assumption is made on the underlying
target.
What we need now is a debugging session from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98341
--- Comment #8 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Arnaud Charlet from comment #7)
> In other words, the bisect result isn't very useful here and I'd recommend
> investigating this change from scratch, getting a useful backtrace from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98341
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98341
--- Comment #6 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #5)
> My git bisect landed on this commit too.
I just pinged Justin again. He unfortunately doesn't seem to have a Bugzilla
account, so we can't add hi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98341
--- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #4)
> This regression was introduced by:
>
> commit d7e20130650fb46d71e0403652e4e07bc14f9775 (refs/bisect/bad)
> Author: Justin Squirek
> Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98341
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98341
--- Comment #4 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
This regression was introduced by:
commit d7e20130650fb46d71e0403652e4e07bc14f9775 (refs/bisect/bad)
Author: Justin Squirek
Date: Mon Aug 10 12:05:07 2020 -0400
[Ada] Reimplementation of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98341
--- Comment #3 from Marius Hillenbrand ---
Potential duplicate: I have seen very similar errors on s390x while reproducing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98228
There, bisecting lead back to d119f34c952f ("New modref/ipa_modref opti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98341
--- Comment #2 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
I have started to bisect this now. aa80d0650ce612d88a62d072b63c2523d547fca8 is
still good while HEAD is broken.
It will take a while until I have a result as I have to perform this bisecting
on q
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98341
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
--- Comm
12 matches
Mail list logo