https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99744
--- Comment #18 from Marc Poulhiès ---
Solved our regressions in pr99744-{1,2,4,5}.c, thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99744
--- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Marc Poulhiès from comment #16)
> Hi!
> I'm seeing regressions in pr99744-{1,2,4,5}.c for an i586 target where
> MMX/SSE are not enabled.
Please try
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99744
Marc Poulhiès changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||poulhies at adacore dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99744
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99744
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:918332d17c8bf0e547c847356db0817ac9f0047f
commit r11-8929-g918332d17c8bf0e547c847356db0817ac9f0047f
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Sat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99744
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||heinzisoft at web dot de
--- Comment #13 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99744
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:72264a639729a5dcc21dbee304717ce22b338bfd
commit r12-2765-g72264a639729a5dcc21dbee304717ce22b338bfd
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Sat Jul 17 07
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99744
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|11.2|11.3
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99744
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|11.0|11.2
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99744
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:71958f740f1b8c47a86ea222418abee395d254a0
commit r11-8109-g71958f740f1b8c47a86ea222418abee395d254a0
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Fri Apr 9 11:4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99744
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5463cee277038df4688b61144db498ae7d24e631
commit r11-7910-g5463cee277038df4688b61144db498ae7d24e631
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Tue Mar 23 20:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99744
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99744
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99744
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:72982851d70dfbc547d83ed2bb45356b9ebe3ff0
commit r11-7825-g72982851d70dfbc547d83ed2bb45356b9ebe3ff0
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Tue Mar 23 20:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99744
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99744
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99744
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
in ix86_can_inline_p
static bool
ix86_can_inline_p (tree caller, tree callee)
{
tree caller_tree = DECL_FUNCTION_SPECIFIC_TARGET (caller);
tree callee_tree = DECL_FUNCTION_SPECIFIC_TARGET (callee);
...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99744
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
it's difficult to check all requirements so elsewhere I suggested to be
forgiving when inlining always-inline functions.
18 matches
Mail list logo
