[Bug testsuite/100569] [12 regression] gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-2.c has lto warnings after r12-742

2022-11-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100569 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||testsuite-fail Target Milestone|---

[Bug testsuite/100569] [12 regression] gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-2.c has lto warnings after r12-742

2021-05-13 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100569 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c3e02c2e442e6b0c298dbe769e0e3b120b5201b2 commit r12-766-gc3e02c2e442e6b0c298dbe769e0e3b120b5201b2 Author: Eric Botcazou Date:

[Bug testsuite/100569] [12 regression] gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-2.c has lto warnings after r12-742

2021-05-13 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100569 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/100569] [12 regression] gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-2.c has lto warnings after r12-742

2021-05-13 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100569 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:810afb0b5fbb9da1e0e51ee9607f275f14c17459 commit r12-762-g810afb0b5fbb9da1e0e51ee9607f275f14c17459 Author: Martin Liska Date: Thu

[Bug testsuite/100569] [12 regression] gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-2.c has lto warnings after r12-742

2021-05-12 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100569 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC|mliska at suse dot cz |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug testsuite/100569] [12 regression] gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-2.c has lto warnings after r12-742

2021-05-12 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100569 --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- OK, there were a LOT of new warnings and such: previous run: g:227a2ecf663d69972b851f51f1934d18927b62cd, r12-741: 52 failures this run: g:7d7d925d0d799eb9dda4a6bd6162af0a7db9c98b, r12-742: