https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103823
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Martin Liska
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7097d2aafcae4b1cb89c28ff4fd4af18df9a2cef
commit r10-11152-g7097d2aafcae4b1cb89c28ff4fd4af18df9a2cef
Author:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103823
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Martin Liska
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:65b768fdb1ad302a6537119305317f413bfcbe0e
commit r11-10455-g65b768fdb1ad302a6537119305317f413bfcbe0e
Author:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103823
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103823
--- Comment #10 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-December/587376.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103823
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #8)
> Created attachment 52064 [details]
> Revised patch
Can you submit this? But it looks correct. And thanks for correcting my patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103823
--- Comment #8 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Created attachment 52064
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52064=edit
Revised patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103823
--- Comment #7 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Did not work: I think it's because it's lto-wrapper not lto1.
Executing on host: /private/tmp/ibin/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../xg++
-B/private/tmp/ibin/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../ /tmp/gcc-darwin-arm6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103823
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 52057
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52057=edit
Patch to test
Can you try this patch?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103823
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #3)
> Any reason not to move the test to the lto testsuite?
Most likely should have been when PR 47334 was filed but since the failure only
showed up on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103823
--- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe ---
if that is not viable
you could prune it locally to the specific test,
or add the prune to the general set in testsuite/lib (perhaps making it
darwin-specific).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103823
--- Comment #3 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Any reason not to move the test to the lto testsuite?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103823
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-12-24
12 matches
Mail list logo
