https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107240
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13 regression] |[13 Regression] FAIL:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107240
--- Comment #2 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hi Seurer, Peter,
Adding something like: { xfail { powerpc*-*-* && { ! powerpc_vsx_ok } } } }
should xfail all powerpc architectures that don't support this no?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107240
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||testsuite-fail
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107240
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #1)
> I guess the first question is, is it expected that the
> vect-bitfield-write-2.c loop should be vectorized on power7 which only has
> Altivec and not VSX?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107240
--- Comment #4 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Might be worth posting the output of -fdump-tree-vect-all might be failing to
vectorize due to some specific lack of feature that we can test for.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107240
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
So perhaps this needs instructions new on P8 (which fleshed out the integer
support amongst other things, but that sounds relevant here?) Test that with
{ powerpc*-*-* && has_arch_pwr8 }
or such? Bu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107240
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107240
--- Comment #7 from Kewen Lin ---
Well, it does helps vect-bitfield-write-{2,3}.c, but it doesn't help
vect-bitfield-write-{2,3,4}.c since they do require vector/vector shift
supports.
I guess it might be a good idea to add the vect_long_long e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107240
--- Comment #8 from Kewen Lin ---
(In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #7)
> Well, it does helps vect-bitfield-write-{2,3}.c, but it doesn't help
> vect-bitfield-write-{2,3,4}.c since they do require vector/vector shift
Oops, typo here, should b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107240
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107240
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5d6e834ecf212e7fc6f585b154af224d2e38c749
commit r13-3396-g5d6e834ecf212e7fc6f585b154af224d2e38c749
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: Thu Oct 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107240
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:225f9c8805fb1ba68a877383095f38a9563526ee
commit r13-3535-g225f9c8805fb1ba68a877383095f38a9563526ee
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: Thu Oct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107240
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
13 matches
Mail list logo
