https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113428
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113428
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Earnshaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c27b30552e6cc789425d3628d294dafc5f3a0861
commit r14-9430-gc27b30552e6cc789425d3628d294dafc5f3a0861
Author: Richard Earnshaw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113428
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113428
--- Comment #6 from Richard Earnshaw ---
Patch here: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-March/647294.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113428
--- Comment #5 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2024-03-06 5:06 a.m., rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> I'm guessing it's this that's causing the problem because int and int* are the
> same size on 32-bit targets. So would changing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113428
--- Comment #4 from Richard Earnshaw ---
/* { dg-warning {cast to pointer from integer of different size} "" { target
*-*-* } .-2 } */
I'm guessing it's this that's causing the problem because int and int* are the
same size on 32-bit targets.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113428
--- Comment #3 from Richard Earnshaw ---
The referenced patch added the test that is failing. How is that a regression?
Or are you suggesting that the test works without the rest of the patch
applied?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113428
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target|powerpc64-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113428
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64-linux-gnu |powerpc64-linux-gnu arm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113428
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
10 matches
Mail list logo
