[Bug testsuite/116080] [15 regression] New tests from r15-2233-g8d1af8f904a0c0 fail

2024-10-02 Thread andi at firstfloor dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116080 --- Comment #19 from andi at firstfloor dot org --- >Is musttail7.c specifically about testing recursive calls? It is mainly about testing the frontend. In the middle end tail recursion is implemented quite differently but the frontend doesn't

[Bug testsuite/116080] [15 regression] New tests from r15-2233-g8d1af8f904a0c0 fail

2024-10-01 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116080 --- Comment #18 from Christophe Lyon --- Sorry, no, this is not the cause of the problem (actually musttail7.c also fails in gcc.log). I looked into this, and it's a bit tricky in arm_function_ok_for_sibcall() (from arm.cc), we have: /*

[Bug testsuite/116080] [15 regression] New tests from r15-2233-g8d1af8f904a0c0 fail

2024-10-01 Thread andi at firstfloor dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116080 --- Comment #17 from andi at firstfloor dot org --- This patch should fix it. Please confirm. diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp index f92f7f1af9c6..f58aed462971 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite

[Bug testsuite/116080] [15 regression] New tests from r15-2233-g8d1af8f904a0c0 fail

2024-09-30 Thread andi at firstfloor dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116080 --- Comment #16 from andi at firstfloor dot org --- On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 03:05:11PM +, clyon at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116080 > > --- Comment #15 from Christophe Lyon --- > (In reply to andi

[Bug testsuite/116080] [15 regression] New tests from r15-2233-g8d1af8f904a0c0 fail

2024-09-30 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116080 --- Comment #15 from Christophe Lyon --- (In reply to andi from comment #14) > The test relies on the > > gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp:check_effective_target_tail_call Are you sure? musttail7.c has: /* { dg-do compile { target { mustta

[Bug testsuite/116080] [15 regression] New tests from r15-2233-g8d1af8f904a0c0 fail

2024-09-30 Thread andi at firstfloor dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116080 --- Comment #14 from andi at firstfloor dot org --- The test relies on the gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp:check_effective_target_tail_call probe matching what the test does. Perhaps the way you are passing options doesn't pass them to th

[Bug testsuite/116080] [15 regression] New tests from r15-2233-g8d1af8f904a0c0 fail

2024-09-30 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116080 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug testsuite/116080] [15 regression] New tests from r15-2233-g8d1af8f904a0c0 fail

2024-09-03 Thread ak at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116080 ak at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug testsuite/116080] [15 regression] New tests from r15-2233-g8d1af8f904a0c0 fail

2024-09-03 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116080 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andi Kleen : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1fad396dd467326251572811b703e788e62a2588 commit r15-3432-g1fad396dd467326251572811b703e788e62a2588 Author: Andi Kleen Date: Mon Jul

[Bug testsuite/116080] [15 regression] New tests from r15-2233-g8d1af8f904a0c0 fail

2024-07-31 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116080 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #10 fro

[Bug testsuite/116080] [15 regression] New tests from r15-2233-g8d1af8f904a0c0 fail

2024-07-29 Thread andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116080 Andi Kleen changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #58761|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug testsuite/116080] [15 regression] New tests from r15-2233-g8d1af8f904a0c0 fail

2024-07-29 Thread andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116080 --- Comment #8 from Andi Kleen --- Patch was reverted, it just made a bunch of tests unsupported. problems: - Need unique name for each new test to not confuse the caching - -O0 tests need to use musttail explictly because the musttail pass onl

[Bug testsuite/116080] [15 regression] New tests from r15-2233-g8d1af8f904a0c0 fail

2024-07-27 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116080 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|New tests from |[15 regression] New tests