--- Comment #19 from gerald at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-20 17:12 ---
Subject: Bug 32843
Author: gerald
Date: Sun Jun 20 17:12:11 2010
New Revision: 161048
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=161048
Log:
Backport from mainline:
2009-09-17 Loren J. R
--- Comment #18 from ljrittle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-17 20:55
---
Subject: Bug 32843
Author: ljrittle
Date: Thu Sep 17 20:54:56 2009
New Revision: 151819
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151819
Log:
2009-09-17 Loren J. Rittle
PR testsuite/32843
--- Comment #17 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-05 20:50
---
Subject: Bug 32843
Author: andreast
Date: Sat Jan 5 20:49:41 2008
New Revision: 131343
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131343
Log:
2008-01-05 Andreas Tobler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #16 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 21:48
---
Regarding comment #14, yep. Patch posted here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-01/msg00041.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32843
--- Comment #15 from doko at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-06 20:13 ---
Subject: Bug 32843
Author: doko
Date: Mon Aug 6 20:13:06 2007
New Revision: 127249
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127249
Log:
- Revert the changes for PR testsuite/32843, not needed on the bra
--- Comment #14 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-06 13:35 ---
In addition: I suspect that this bug also is manifested on x86 Darwin, but my
patch should not affect that system at all, and therefore I suspect that this
bug is still manifested on that system.
--
http://gcc.gnu.
--- Comment #13 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-06 12:53 ---
> The 32bit psABI specifies Integral Arguments as 'Functions pass all
> integer-valued
> arguments as words, expanding or padding signed or unsigned bytes and
> halfwords as needed'. For return values the best I can fin
--- Comment #12 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-06 12:48 ---
Subject: Bug 32843
Author: aph
Date: Mon Aug 6 12:48:07 2007
New Revision: 127241
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127241
Log:
PR testsuite/32843
* src/x86/sysv.S (ffi_closure_raw
--- Comment #11 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-31 15:06 ---
Subject: Bug 32843
Author: aph
Date: Tue Jul 31 15:05:52 2007
New Revision: 127093
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127093
Log:
2007-07-30 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR testsuite/
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-26 10:01
---
Well, honestly not. Still other frontends do not do return type promotion
themselves, so the backend is responsible for doing this. Do you have any
suggestion on what target to look at to verify this?
--
htt
--- Comment #9 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-26 09:25 ---
But the change was in generic code, are you very sure you haven't changed ABI
on any of the targets?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32843
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-26 09:14 ---
Subject: Bug 32843
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jul 26 09:13:58 2007
New Revision: 126950
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126950
Log:
2007-07-26 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-26 09:14 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #6 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-25 20:11
---
Fine with me, thanks and sorry for the delay. Pls ci.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32843
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-24 11:47 ---
The 32bit psABI specifies Integral Arguments as 'Functions pass all
integer-valued
arguments as words, expanding or padding signed or unsigned bytes and
halfwords as needed'. For return values the best I can find is
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-24 10:27 ---
Index: return_sc.c
===
--- return_sc.c (revision 126678)
+++ return_sc.c (working copy)
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ int main (void)
sc < (signed char) 127
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-24 10:25 ---
So, my final conclusion would be that this is a testsuite bug because whether
we do zero or sign extension for returns in a register does not matter for
valid uses of this return value.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu
17 matches
Mail list logo
