[Bug testsuite/42933] Test suite reports excess unexpected failures when using RUNTESTFLAGS to pass extra options

2010-02-01 Thread bgarvin at acm dot org
--- Comment #4 from bgarvin at acm dot org 2010-02-02 01:43 --- (In reply to comment #3) > >torture > For the torture test you can set the TORTURE OPTIONS separately and let the > testsuite do the rest. > Yeah, that's what I meant. Thanks for the clarification and sorry about the inva

[Bug testsuite/42933] Test suite reports excess unexpected failures when using RUNTESTFLAGS to pass extra options

2010-02-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-02 01:36 --- >torture For the torture test you can set the TORTURE OPTIONS separately and let the testsuite do the rest. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42933

[Bug testsuite/42933] Test suite reports excess unexpected failures when using RUNTESTFLAGS to pass extra options

2010-02-01 Thread bgarvin at acm dot org
--- Comment #2 from bgarvin at acm dot org 2010-02-02 01:30 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Well RUNTESTFLAGS is really only useful for options which change the ABI and > have a multilib. Like -fPIC/-m64/-m32, etc. -std=c++0x changes the input > language which is used so therefor change

[Bug testsuite/42933] Test suite reports excess unexpected failures when using RUNTESTFLAGS to pass extra options

2010-02-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-02 01:14 --- Well RUNTESTFLAGS is really only useful for options which change the ABI and have a multilib. Like -fPIC/-m64/-m32, etc. -std=c++0x changes the input language which is used so therefor changes the whole testsuite.