http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #1 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-23 10:58:36 UTC ---
> Before revision 171039 the test was unsupported:
>
> UNSUPPORTED: /opt/gcc/p_work/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/pr46940_0.c
>
> because the test for 'check_linker_plug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-03-23
14:56:37 UTC ---
> Which linker do you use, and what's the value of HAVE_LTO_PLUGIN in
> gcc/auto-host.h? Could you check the gcc/config.log snippet for the
> linker plugin support test.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-23 15:05:17 UTC ---
> The linker is
>
> @(#)PROGRAM:ld PROJECT:ld64-97.17
> llvm version 2.9svn, from Apple Clang 1.7 (build 77)
>
> on x86_64-apple-darwin10.7.0, and
>
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-03-23
15:28:31 UTC ---
> What happens if you try to compile and link the test program from
> check_linker_plugin_available with the new gcc?
>
> $ cd gcc
> $ cat > lpl.c
> int main() { retur
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-23 15:38:08 UTC ---
I see what's going on now: Darwin (in gcc/config/darwin.h) is one of
only two targets (besides i386/djgpp.h) that override
LINK_COMMAND_SPEC.
I think darw
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at nitro dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-03-23
17:08:59 UTC ---
With the change in comment #5, bootstrapping fails with
ld: file not found: LINK_PLUGIN_SPEC
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[5]: *** [libgcc_s.dylib] Error 1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-23 17:10:38 UTC ---
> maybe this is getting complex enough to warrant a spec of its own? (and then
> we
> could avoid cloning it)
Why would you want to clone that? LINK_PLUG
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #10 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-23 17:15:46 UTC ---
> --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres
> 2011-03-23 17:08:59 UTC ---
> With the change in comment #5, bootstrapping fails with
>
> ld: file not found
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #11 from Iain Sandoe 2011-03-23 17:20:01
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> > maybe this is getting complex enough to warrant a spec of its own? (and
> > then we
> > could avoid cloning it)
> The fact that Darwin uses a clo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #12 from Iain Sandoe 2011-03-23 17:38:57
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> > --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres
> > 2011-03-23 17:08:59 UTC ---
> > With the change in comment #5, bootstrapping fails with
> >
> > ld:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #13 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-23 17:49:55 UTC ---
> au contraire, I think Rainer is right... ;) ... Iain did not engage brain
> sufficiently...
Me neither ;-)
> but one needs the " " around the insert
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #14 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-23
18:01:03 UTC ---
If you guys like the patch from #12, I'll approve it... Looks reasonable to
me.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #15 from Iain Sandoe 2011-03-23 18:27:45
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> If you guys like the patch from #12, I'll approve it... Looks reasonable to
> me.
it seems to the the Right Thing on *-darwin9 (cross-to-cris-elf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #16 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-23 18:41:57 UTC ---
> it seems to the the Right Thing on *-darwin9 (cross-to-cris-elf will take
> longer).
>
> Executing on host: /Volumes/ScratchCS/gcc-4-7-trunk-build/gcc/xg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #17 from Iain Sandoe 2011-03-23 18:46:06
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> > it seems to the the Right Thing on *-darwin9 (cross-to-cris-elf will take
> > longer).
> >
> > Executing on host: /Volumes/ScratchCS/gcc-4-7-trunk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #18 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-23 18:52:16 UTC ---
> --- Comment #17 from Iain Sandoe 2011-03-23
> 18:46:06 UTC ---
> (In reply to comment #16)
>> > it seems to the the Right Thing on *-darwin9 (cross-to-c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #19 from Iain Sandoe 2011-03-24 12:40:52
UTC ---
AFAICT, comment #12 is OK on *-darwin9 including cross-cris-elf.
given that Mike has approved,
if someone could chip in with a test on x86-64-darwin10, I would think you
could
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #20 from Dominique d'Humieres
2011-03-24 18:46:41 UTC ---
> AFAICT, comment #12 is OK on *-darwin9 including cross-cris-elf.
> given that Mike has approved,
> if someone could chip in with a test on x86-64-darwin10, I would think you
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #21 from Rainer Orth 2011-03-28 11:07:02
UTC ---
Author: ro
Date: Mon Mar 28 11:06:58 2011
New Revision: 171598
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171598
Log:
PR target/48245
* config/darwin.h (LINK_COMMAND
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #23 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-28 11:11:09 UTC ---
> --- Comment #20 from Dominique d'Humieres
> 2011-03-24 18:46:41 UTC ---
>> AFAICT, comment #12 is OK on *-darwin9 including cross-cris-elf.
>> given that Mike
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #24 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-28
11:18:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> > AFAICT, comment #12 is OK on *-darwin9 including cross-cris-elf.
> > given that Mike has approved,
> > if someone could chip in with a test on x86-64
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #25 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-28 11:21:20 UTC ---
>> supposed to test? pr46940_0.c fails because "only weak aliases are supported"
>> on darwin and the other tests pass even without plugin support.
>
> They are va
25 matches
Mail list logo
