http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51258
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51258
--- Comment #20 from Andrew Macleod 2012-03-22
12:10:45 UTC ---
Is this not resolved in 4.7? I thought we had changed the timeouts back to
normal and added other mechanisms to avoid large infinite loops
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51258
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #19 from Richard Gue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51258
--- Comment #18 from Jack Howarth 2011-12-06
20:53:35 UTC ---
The actual binaries for atomic-load-int128.c at -O1 and higher run fine on
x86_64-apple-darwin64 at -m64. However they take around 16 seconds to execute
on a...
Model Name: Mac
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51258
--- Comment #17 from Uros Bizjak 2011-12-06 19:29:09
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> Created attachment 26009 [details]
> log of FAIL: gcc.dg/simulate-thread/atomic-load-int128.c -O1 -g thread
> simulation test failure on x86_64-apple-darwi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51258
--- Comment #16 from Jack Howarth 2011-12-06
19:13:59 UTC ---
Created attachment 26009
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26009
log of FAIL: gcc.dg/simulate-thread/atomic-load-int128.c -O1 -g thread
simulation test failure on x
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51258
Jack Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at nitro dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51258
--- Comment #14 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-25 19:31:02 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Nov 25 19:30:58 2011
New Revision: 181728
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181728
Log:
PR testsuite/51258
* lib/target-sup
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51258
--- Comment #13 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-25 17:41:49 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Nov 25 17:41:44 2011
New Revision: 181727
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181727
Log:
PR testsuite/51258
* lib/target-sup
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51258
--- Comment #12 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-11-25 16:35:43 UTC ---
> --- Comment #11 from Uros Bizjak 2011-11-25
> 16:26:41 UTC ---
> I have additional patch that checks cpuid bit_CMPXCHG16B (and bit_CMPXCHG8B
> fwiw) for runtim
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51258
--- Comment #11 from Uros Bizjak 2011-11-25 16:26:41
UTC ---
I have additional patch that checks cpuid bit_CMPXCHG16B (and bit_CMPXCHG8B
fwiw) for runtime support.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51258
--- Comment #10 from Rainer Orth 2011-11-24 16:34:16
UTC ---
Author: ro
Date: Thu Nov 24 16:34:09 2011
New Revision: 181697
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181697
Log:
Fix several atomic tests on 32-bit x86 (PR testsuite/51
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51258
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51258
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Macleod 2011-11-22
19:34:03 UTC ---
yes, presuming that it works, which I think it will, that will have to be
applied to all the gcc.dg/atomic*-5.c files, as well as the
gcc.dg/simulate-thread/atomic-*-int128.c files.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51258
--- Comment #7 from Uros Bizjak 2011-11-22 19:29:20
UTC ---
Can somebody please test following change:
--cut here--
Index: atomic-exchange-5.c
===
--- atomic-exchange-5.c (revision
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51258
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |testsuite
--- Comment #6 from Uros Bizjak
16 matches
Mail list logo
