[Bug testsuite/82920] cet test failures on darwin

2019-04-19 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82920 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ABI, wrong-code --- Comment #6 from Iain

[Bug testsuite/82920] cet test failures on darwin

2019-04-19 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82920 --- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe --- Created attachment 46208 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46208=edit Patch for codegen and testsuite This is not just a testsuite issue, there are multiple places where incorrect code is

[Bug testsuite/82920] cet test failures on darwin

2018-12-23 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82920 --- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe --- It might be better to move all the CET tests into a separate directory with a .exp file that tests for compile-time (and runtime) support, so that as hardware becomes available - and assembler support, things

[Bug testsuite/82920] cet test failures on darwin

2018-12-23 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82920 --- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe --- I believe that the target-supports test needs the -fcf-protection flag to ensure that code generated is appropriate (the endbr* insns are not accepted yet by the Xcode assembler, although they will be at some

[Bug testsuite/82920] cet test failures on darwin

2018-03-28 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82920 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #0) Maybe these tests should be limited to Linux targets.

[Bug testsuite/82920] cet test failures on darwin

2018-03-28 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82920 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|