https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83483
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83483
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Dec 20 17:01:24 2017
New Revision: 255899
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255899=gcc=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/83483 - [8 Regression] gcc.dg/memcpy-6.c FAILs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83483
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83483
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83483
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83483
--- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Is this still an issue? Or is it no longer a ppc64 issue?
$ uname -a
Linux gcc1-power7.osuosl.org 3.10.0-514.26.2.el7.ppc64 #1 SMP Mon Jul 10
02:26:53 GMT 2017 ppc64 ppc64 ppc64 GNU/Linux
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83483
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83483
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |testsuite
