[Bug testsuite/95720] [11 Regression] New dump output filename strategy invalidates tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95720 --- Comment #19 from Torbjörn SVENSSON --- Forgot to mention the PR number in the commit message, but this ticket is also related to the change. https://gcc.gnu.org/g:86291da0057d01efdaba71f28cad80b69dc703a4 commit r13-2989-g86291da0057

[Bug testsuite/95720] [11 Regression] New dump output filename strategy invalidates tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95720 --- Comment #18 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Yvan Roux : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9d503515ceebc778a5c2958f7459367c34f1fed0 commit r13-2655-g9d503515ceebc778a5c2958f7459367c34f1fed0 Author: Torbjörn SVENSSON Date:

[Bug testsuite/95720] [11 Regression] New dump output filename strategy invalidates tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95720 --- Comment #17 from Christophe Lyon --- I think Torbjorn is right, at the fix seems as simple as handling "-T" the same as "-Xlinker" in gcc_adjust_linker_flags_list. However, looking at the GCC documentation, under "Linker Options", I

[Bug testsuite/95720] [11 Regression] New dump output filename strategy invalidates tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95720 Torbjörn SVENSSON changed: What|Removed |Added CC||torbjorn.svensson at foss dot st.c

[Bug testsuite/95720] [11 Regression] New dump output filename strategy invalidates tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95720 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug testsuite/95720] [11 Regression] New dump output filename strategy invalidates tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95720 --- Comment #14 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Alexandre Oliva : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5fa1767aa45e1a927e832ccc09e959d4c8a9548c commit r11-2311-g5fa1767aa45e1a927e832ccc09e959d4c8a9548c Author: Alexandre Oliva

[Bug testsuite/95720] [11 Regression] New dump output filename strategy invalidates tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95720 --- Comment #13 from Andrea Corallo --- "aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org" writes: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95720 > > Alexandre Oliva changed: > >What|Removed |Added >

[Bug testsuite/95720] [11 Regression] New dump output filename strategy invalidates tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95720 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #48886|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug testsuite/95720] [11 Regression] New dump output filename strategy invalidates tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95720 --- Comment #11 from Andrea Corallo --- Hi Alexandre, thanks for the patch, the version attached does the job here for the mentioned testcase. I touched a couple of lines, please have a look as my tcl is quite limited. Andrea

[Bug testsuite/95720] [11 Regression] New dump output filename strategy invalidates tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95720 --- Comment #10 from Alexandre Oliva --- Created attachment 48886 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48886=edit patch that hopefully fixes the problem Does this fix the problem in your testglue-requiring test runs?

[Bug testsuite/95720] [11 Regression] New dump output filename strategy invalidates tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95720 --- Comment #9 from Andrea Corallo --- "clyon at gcc dot gnu.org" writes: > I guess that's the "testglue" object file added by Dejagnu when > needs_status_wrapper is set in the .exp file. Yep, is set in libs in proc 'gcc_target_compile' If I

[Bug testsuite/95720] [11 Regression] New dump output filename strategy invalidates tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95720 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug testsuite/95720] [11 Regression] New dump output filename strategy invalidates tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95720 --- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva --- now, if it is from the board config file, maybe it had better be moved to ldflags or libs; both of them undergo some -Wl, treatment of object files and libs already.

[Bug testsuite/95720] [11 Regression] New dump output filename strategy invalidates tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95720 --- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva --- In case that's from some board config file, I suggest prefixing it with -Wl, so that it doesn't count as an additional input.

[Bug testsuite/95720] [11 Regression] New dump output filename strategy invalidates tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95720 --- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva --- that's because of the second input gcc_tg.o can you tell where that comes from?

[Bug testsuite/95720] [11 Regression] New dump output filename strategy invalidates tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95720 --- Comment #4 from Andrea Corallo --- "aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org" writes: > --- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva --- > akrl, any clue as to where this .out is coming from in your runs? I get .exe > in my arm test runs; I don't see anything

[Bug testsuite/95720] [11 Regression] New dump output filename strategy invalidates tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95720 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from

[Bug testsuite/95720] [11 Regression] New dump output filename strategy invalidates tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95720 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9efbb03616f556dcceabe364f734b5b11fb13587 commit r11-1446-g9efbb03616f556dcceabe364f734b5b11fb13587 Author: Martin Liska Date: Wed

[Bug testsuite/95720] [11 Regression] New dump output filename strategy invalidates tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95720 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Target Milestone|---