https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89915
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89915
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Roland Illig from comment #2)
> But then I remembered that "internal compiler errors" have also made their
> way into gcc.pot. I don't see any benefit in translating internal errors,
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89915
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89915
--- Comment #2 from Roland Illig ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> params should be considered as internal options
When I read the above, I first thought: Yay, less strings for me to translate.
Just exclude them from gcc.pot.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89915
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
While I agree that params.def needs some fix ups in their working. params
should be considered as internal options which only should be used for
debugging and not even documented in the normal
