https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93759
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||easyhack
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93759
--- Comment #7 from Roland Illig ---
Is there still something to do for this bug?
de.po looks good now, having "c-no-format" instead of "c-format".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93759
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8d1780b56d0cb1d50115d4e925e81cd8b9cb2923
commit r10-6794-g8d1780b56d0cb1d50115d4e925e81cd8b9cb2923
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93759
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 47861
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47861&action=edit
gcc10-pr93759.patch
I think this patch should fix both issues, but in gcc.pot lots off the *.opt
messages are t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93759
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93759
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93759
--- Comment #2 from Roland Illig ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #1)
> Apparently the problem is that "% p" looks like a valid c-format.
Then there's a bug in either gettext or the GCC definitions of where c-format
strings may appea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93759
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
Apparently the problem is that "% p" looks like a valid c-format.
