https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100756
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|13.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100756
--- Comment #11 from Robin Dapp ---
Just noticed this is still open due to the retargeting message.
IMHO this can be closed. I'm pretty sure I erroneously used the GCC 12 target
when opening the bug when it should have been trunk/GCC 13.
I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100756
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.4|12.5
--- Comment #10 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100756
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.3|12.4
--- Comment #9 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100756
--- Comment #8 from rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org ---
For completeness: haven't observed any fallout on s390 since and the regression
is fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100756
Bug 100756 depends on bug 107499, which changed state.
Bug 107499 Summary: [13 Regression] 433.milc regressed by 6-8% on zen3 at -O2
-flto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107499
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100756
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100756
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
