https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101750
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101750
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9fcb8ec60302f5f110f94a885b618993c28d18d3
commit r12-2734-g9fcb8ec60302f5f110f94a885b618993c28d18d3
Author: Tamar Christina
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101750
--- Comment #7 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #6)
> On Wed, 4 Aug 2021, tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101750
> >
> > --- Comment #5 from Tamar Christ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101750
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 4 Aug 2021, tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101750
>
> --- Comment #5 from Tamar Christina ---
> And yes the same semantics apply to 'i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101750
--- Comment #5 from Tamar Christina ---
And yes the same semantics apply to 'i', but if I read it right the patch in
r12-2523 is tracking variables that are read but never written to. So 'i'
escaped the same issue because it's written to somewh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101750
--- Comment #4 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #3)
> On Tue, 3 Aug 2021, tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101750
> >
> > --- Comment #2 from Tamar Christ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101750
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021, tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101750
>
> --- Comment #2 from Tamar Christina ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101750
--- Comment #2 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> On x86_64 the testcase is optimized to the following now:
> not sure how we conclude that 'n' is not written to anywhere. The issue
> persists even when I re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101750
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101750
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Target|
10 matches
Mail list logo