[Bug tree-optimization/102009] [12 Regression] ICE: in gimple_call_arg, at gimple.h:3272 by r12-2976

2021-11-16 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102009 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/102009] [12 Regression] ICE: in gimple_call_arg, at gimple.h:3272 by r12-2976

2021-11-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102009 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eacdfaf7ca07367ede1a0c50aa997953958dabae commit r12-5294-geacdfaf7ca07367ede1a0c50aa997953958dabae Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug tree-optimization/102009] [12 Regression] ICE: in gimple_call_arg, at gimple.h:3272 by r12-2976

2021-11-15 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102009 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- gimple_builtin_call_types_compatible_p() returns false even for calls with trivial mismatches like an int where a size_t is expected. I would prefer a less restrictive test that doesn't prevent detecting the

[Bug tree-optimization/102009] [12 Regression] ICE: in gimple_call_arg, at gimple.h:3272 by r12-2976

2021-11-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102009 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/102009] [12 Regression] ICE: in gimple_call_arg, at gimple.h:3272 by r12-2976

2021-08-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102009 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1