https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102196
--- Comment #6 from Jan-Benedict Glaw ---
Calling the compiler again with just adding -fanalyzer doesn't add more
information to the output. Do I need to turn on extra warnings to enable static
analysis for access to possibly uninitialized
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102196
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102196
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102196
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
tc-microblaze.c case:
if (exp.X_op != O_constant)
as_warn (_("Symbol used as immediate for shift instruction"));
else
{
output = frag_more (isize);
immed =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102196
--- Comment #2 from Jan-Benedict Glaw ---
Declaration and possibly uninitialized usage are shown. Ie for said Binutils, I
get these messages:
microblaze-{elf,linux}
[all 2021-09-03 18:17:30] depbase=`echo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102196
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Component|middle-end
