https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103175
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103175
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103175
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4526ec20f17a6182f754da9460d9d944dd123cc0
commit r12-5201-g4526ec20f17a6182f754da9460d9d944dd123cc0
Author: Jan Hubicka
Date: Fri N
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103175
--- Comment #6 from David Binderman ---
Created attachment 51773
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51773&action=edit
gzipped C++ source code
Another test case. Flag -O1 required.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103175
--- Comment #5 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz ---
The sanity check verifies that functions acessing parameter indirectly
also reads the parameter (otherwise the indirect reference can not
happen). This patch moves the check earlier and remo
The sanity check verifies that functions acessing parameter indirectly
also reads the parameter (otherwise the indirect reference can not
happen). This patch moves the check earlier and removes some overactive
flag cleaning on function call boundary which introduces the non-sential
situation. I g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103175
--- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Also this one which fails but doesn't ICE
g:d70ef65692fced7ab72e0aceeff7407e5a34d96d, r12-5113
make -k check-gcc-fortran
RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=gfortran.dg/inline_matmul_17.f90"
FAIL: gfortran.dg/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103175
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103175
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103175
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
FAIL: 18_support/nested_exception/rethrow_if_nested.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: 20_util/variant/exception_safety.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: 20_util/variant/run.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103175
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|internal compiler error: in |[12 Regression] internal
11 matches
Mail list logo