https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104655
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104655
--- Comment #7 from Paul Menzel ---
Thank you for the analysis. Excuse my ignorance, but the referenced bug
(possible dup) says it’s a regression in GCC 11, but it does not show up here
with GCC 11. Are more issues tracked in bug 99578?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104655
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Paul Menzel from comment #5)
> Created attachment 52498 [details]
> Preprocessed file `build/bootblock/cpu/x86/lapic/lapic.i` with `-save-temps`
>
> Sorry for not sharing the file in the first
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104655
--- Comment #5 from Paul Menzel ---
Created attachment 52498
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52498&action=edit
Preprocessed file `build/bootblock/cpu/x86/lapic/lapic.i` with `-save-temps`
Sorry for not sharing the file in t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104655
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104655
--- Comment #3 from Paul Menzel ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> I am 90% sure this is just another dup of bug 99578.
Are you sure, because the warnings/errors are not there with GCC 11.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104655
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-02-23
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104655
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104655
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Can you provide the preprocessed source in all cases?
