https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105384
--- Comment #7 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Using host libm routines is a bad idea, that would make the generated code
depend on the host libm and processor. Having a cut-off to avoid constant
folding these functions for n >= 128 m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105384
--- Comment #6 from Zdenek Sojka ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> The bessel functions are known to take a lot of time, there are (fixed?)
> older bugreports about those and we do take some measures to speed up the
> computatio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105384
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
The bessel functions are known to take a lot of time, there are (fixed?) older
bugreports about those and we do take some measures to speed up the
computation.
We might want to give up the idea on producing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105384
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105384
--- Comment #3 from Zdenek Sojka ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Can you try the one that is downloaded via contrib/download_pre*.
The you for the comment. The versions I am using are:
[ebuild R] dev-libs/gmp-6.2.1-r2
[
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105384
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Can you try the one that is downloaded via contrib/download_pre*.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105384
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
What version of gmp, mpfr are you using?
