[Bug tree-optimization/105679] [12 Regression] extra -Warray-bounds warning added with -fsanitize=shift due to jump threading

2024-06-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105679 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|12.4|12.5 --- Comment #13 from Richard Bien

[Bug tree-optimization/105679] [12 Regression] extra -Warray-bounds warning added with -fsanitize=shift due to jump threading

2023-05-08 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105679 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|12.3|12.4 --- Comment #12 from Richard Bien

[Bug tree-optimization/105679] [12 Regression] extra -Warray-bounds warning added with -fsanitize=shift due to jump threading

2022-10-07 Thread kees at outflux dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105679 --- Comment #11 from Kees Cook --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10) > I sofar refrained from doing this because of the large amount of fallout and > followup changes and I think those are not warranted on the GCC 12 branch. Totally

[Bug tree-optimization/105679] [12 Regression] extra -Warray-bounds warning added with -fsanitize=shift due to jump threading

2022-10-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105679 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Kees Cook from comment #9) > Does anyone have some time to do this backport for GCC 12? I sofar refrained from doing this because of the large amount of fallout and followup changes and I thi

[Bug tree-optimization/105679] [12 Regression] extra -Warray-bounds warning added with -fsanitize=shift due to jump threading

2022-10-06 Thread kees at outflux dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105679 Kees Cook changed: What|Removed |Added CC||qing.zhao at oracle dot com --- Comment #9

[Bug tree-optimization/105679] [12 Regression] extra -Warray-bounds warning added with -fsanitize=shift due to jump threading

2022-08-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105679 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|12.2|12.3 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biene

[Bug tree-optimization/105679] [12 Regression] extra -Warray-bounds warning added with -fsanitize=shift due to jump threading

2022-08-01 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105679 Bug 105679 depends on bug 106495, which changed state. Bug 106495 Summary: [13 Regression] Build fails gcc/tree-ssa-threadbackward.cc:22: gcc/vec.h:890:19: error: array subscript 4294967294 is above array bounds of 'basic_block_def* [1]' [-Wer

[Bug tree-optimization/105679] [12 Regression] extra -Warray-bounds warning added with -fsanitize=shift due to jump threading

2022-08-01 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105679 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/105679] [12 Regression] extra -Warray-bounds warning added with -fsanitize=shift due to jump threading

2022-07-30 Thread kees at outflux dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105679 --- Comment #6 from Kees Cook --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > Should be fixed on trunk. Can you check on the original unreduced testcase? Thanks! I've done test builds and can confirm these two false positives have been elim

[Bug tree-optimization/105679] [12 Regression] extra -Warray-bounds warning added with -fsanitize=shift due to jump threading

2022-07-29 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105679 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||13.0 Summary|[12/13 Regress