https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107672
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107672
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:09b7993ab6d93716f77c03ff9a9165fa4b579f0d
commit r13-4227-g09b7993ab6d93716f77c03ff9a9165fa4b579f0d
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107672
--- Comment #3 from Zopolis0 ---
I was in the middle of bisecting it, but that solved the issue perfectly!
Thanks!
I haven't tested it yet on a fresh rebase on upstream, but there's no reason
why it wouldn't work there.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107672
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107672
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
It looks like the code looks for a vector type even ... I'm going to test
diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc
index bc0ef136f19..b35b986889d 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc
++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107672
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
CC|