[Bug tree-optimization/108467] false positive -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning at -O1 or higher

2024-06-15 Thread vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108467 --- Comment #4 from Vincent Lefèvre --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #3) > For 14/15, it seems gone with -O2, but I see it with -Og. The warning still occurs with -O1 too.

[Bug tree-optimization/108467] false positive -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning at -O1 or higher

2024-06-14 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108467 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug tree-optimization/108467] false positive -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning at -O1 or higher

2023-01-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108467 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- There's some special code dealing with checking on a conditional set value but that's confused by the two-value guard here.

[Bug tree-optimization/108467] false positive -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning at -O1 or higher

2023-01-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108467 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Known to fail|