https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109175
--- Comment #8 from Mathieu Malaterre ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> Notice how there is no check for null on aq.
Do you want to keep this one open or should we close it as invalid ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109175
--- Comment #7 from Jan Wassenberg ---
Thanks, I will be changing the code to add a nullptr check.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109175
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reduced all the way removing all of the classes showing exactly what I thought
it was:
```
void *ao();
float *aq(long t) {
if (t)
return nullptr;
return static_cast(ao());
}
float v;
void at(long t)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109175
--- Comment #5 from Mathieu Malaterre ---
c-reduce(d) ugly version:
% cat demo3.cc
struct d {
using b = float &;
};
template using c = d::b;
struct e {
using b = c;
};
template struct j;
template using h = typename j::b;
template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109175
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
auto in = AllocateAligned(padded);
The pointer returned here could be a nullptr
The warning is due to jump threading though.
AllocateAligned calls AllocateAlignedItems
Which could return
