https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109546
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|13.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109546
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.2|13.3
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109546
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109546
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f828503eeb79ad1f1ada6db7deccc5abcc2f3ca3
commit r14-160-gf828503eeb79ad1f1ada6db7deccc5abcc2f3ca3
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109546
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Macleod ---
And I think the first part of this is a duplicate of another PR from GCC12
time (I dont know which one) whereby we are not making staticly initialized
values available in main(). so VRP never sees that d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109546
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Macleod ---
Patch in testing.
when deciding to fold condition of builtin_unreachable, VRP is failing to
recognize that given
if (ptr == &x)
__builtin_unreachable ()
&x is not a representable range, and thus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109546
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Macleod ---
*** Bug 109588 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109546
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com,