https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110204
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110204
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d0de3bf9175877d6c51c94fe04662c6e031876e1
commit r14-2674-gd0de3bf9175877d6c51c94fe04662c6e031876e1
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110204
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> Yeah, the issue is that PRE figures out a new value here but we've already
> done value-numbering so we can't alter the "old" solution here. So what we
> do
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110204
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Yeah, the issue is that PRE figures out a new value here but we've already done
value-numbering so we can't alter the "old" solution here. So what we do
is add a '0' with value '_42' (instead of value '0')
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110204
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110204
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
PRE leaves around:
[local count: 118111600]:
...
pretmp_163 = 0;
[local count: 19488414]:
if (pretmp_163 != 0)
goto ; [59.00%]
else
goto ; [41.00%]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110204
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
The preprocessed source that is produced by GCC 13 is warning free.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110204
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Summary|Suspicous warni