[Bug tree-optimization/110289] Phiprop may be good idea in early opts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110289 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/110289] Phiprop may be good idea in early opts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110289 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- probably makes sense, yes.

[Bug tree-optimization/110289] Phiprop may be good idea in early opts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110289 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/110289] Phiprop may be good idea in early opts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110289 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka --- This patch fixes the problem diff --git a/gcc/passes.def b/gcc/passes.def index c9a8f19747b..faa5208b26b 100644 --- a/gcc/passes.def +++ b/gcc/passes.def @@ -88,6 +88,8 @@ along with GCC; see the file

[Bug tree-optimization/110289] Phiprop may be good idea in early opts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110289 --- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka --- This is caused by the way libstdc++ defines max: constexpr inline const _Tp& max(const _Tp& __a, const _Tp& __b) { if (__a < __b) return __b; return __a; }