[Bug tree-optimization/110502] [14 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -Os since r14-1656-g55fcaa9a8bd

2024-03-08 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110502 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org Prior

[Bug tree-optimization/110502] [14 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -Os since r14-1656-g55fcaa9a8bd

2023-06-30 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110502 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Target Milestone|

[Bug tree-optimization/110502] [14 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -Os since r14-1656-g55fcaa9a8bd

2023-06-30 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110502 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-06-30 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug tree-optimization/110502] [14 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -Os since r14-1656-g55fcaa9a8bd

2023-09-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110502 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Note LIM2 has way different IR selection which is kinda interesting since there are no stores that happened in the bbs that were removed: if (_2 != 0) goto ; [75.00%] else goto ; [25.00%] [lo