https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110628
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110628
--- Comment #10 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #9)
> (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #8)
> > patch posted
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-August/628231.html
>
> Yay! I stand
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110628
--- Comment #9 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #8)
> patch posted
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-August/628231.html
Yay! I stand ready to revert my ugly cover-up.
I'll even give the posted
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110628
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka ---
patch posted
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-August/628231.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110628
--- Comment #7 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #5)
> Not seeing any action for this regression for three weeks, for tracking
> purposes I'm considering xfailing this test-case for cris-* after another
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110628
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
The mismatch happens on:
void foo (unsigned int x)
{
if (x != 0x800 && x != 0x810)
abort ();
}
It is bug in reassoc turning:
void foo (unsigned int x)
{
;; basic block 2, loop depth 0, count
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110628
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110628
--- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 55563
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55563=edit
All the intermediate files in a .tar.gz
Here are all the files zipped up.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110628
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
> -fdump-tree-all-blocks-details produced more than 100 dump files. Which
> one(s)
> do you want?
Can you just zip them an attach all?
Thank you!
Honza
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110628
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
-fdump-tree-all-blocks-details produced more than 100 dump files. Which one(s)
do you want?
seurer@ltcden2-lp1:~/gcc/git/build/gcc-test$
/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/xgcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110628
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka ---
The testcase was, for many years, not checking what it was intended to since
Invalid sums are now output only with ...-details-blocks dumps and not by
default.
It passes for me. Can you please attach
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110628
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||testsuite-fail
Target Milestone|---
12 matches
Mail list logo
