[Bug tree-optimization/111472] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu since r11-4563-gd0d8b5d836

2023-09-19 Thread xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111472 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Summary|Wrong code at -Os on

[Bug tree-optimization/111472] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu since r11-4563-gd0d8b5d836

2023-09-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111472 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/111472] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu since r11-4563-gd0d8b5d836

2023-11-06 Thread amacleod at redhat dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111472 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Macleod --- I'm not sure that this didn't uncover something elsewhere, possibly ivopts since that pass seems to be generating something different and I think there were some fixes put in there on trunk?. Regardless, t

[Bug tree-optimization/111472] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu since r11-4563-gd0d8b5d836

2023-11-06 Thread amacleod at redhat dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111472 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Macleod --- (In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #3) > I'm not sure that this didn't uncover something elsewhere, possibly ivopts > since that pass seems to be generating something different and I think there > wer

[Bug tree-optimization/111472] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu since r11-4563-gd0d8b5d836

2023-11-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111472 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #3) > I'm not sure that this didn't uncover something elsewhere, possibly ivopts > since that pass seems to be generating something different and I think there > were