https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441
--- Comment #8 from JuzheZhong ---
I believe the change between Nov and Dec causes regression.
But I don't continue on bisection.
Hope this information can help with your bisection.
Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441
--- Comment #7 from JuzheZhong ---
(In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #6)
> Hello,
>
> I can bisect it if you want. it should only take a few seconds.
Ok. Thanks a lot ...
I take 2 hours to bisect it manually but still didn't locate t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441
--- Comment #6 from Tamar Christina ---
Hello,
I can bisect it if you want. it should only take a few seconds.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441
--- Comment #5 from JuzheZhong ---
Confirm at Nov, 1. The regression is gone.
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=eac0917bd3d2ead4829d56c8f2769176087c7b3d
This commit is ok, which has no regressions.
Still bisecting manually.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||13.2.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441
--- Comment #3 from JuzheZhong ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> It might be
>
> t.c:29:22: missed: Data access with gaps requires scalar epilogue loop
>
> required when vectorizing the load groups. We end up with
>
> t.c:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target Milestone
