[Bug tree-optimization/113879] missed optimization - not exploiting known range of integers

2024-05-23 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113879 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:efc4255d4393cba3d2232a7152799e1b161c3062 commit r15-802-gefc4255d4393cba3d2232a7152799e1b161c3062 Author: Andrew MacLeod Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/113879] missed optimization - not exploiting known range of integers

2024-02-12 Thread amacleod at redhat dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113879 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Macleod --- Not so much a cycle issue as a backward propagation issue. : goto ; [INV] : _1 = (long unsigned int) j_10; <..> if (j_10 >= -1) goto ; [INV] else goto ; [INV] : __builtin_trap

[Bug tree-optimization/113879] missed optimization - not exploiting known range of integers

2024-02-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113879 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||85316 CC|